Skip to main content
Playroom Kit is a managed multiplayer SDK aimed at web games and collaborative apps (HTML5, Unity WebGL, browser puzzles). It optimizes hard for “ship a working multiplayer game in an afternoon” — at the cost of being managed-only infrastructure.

​
TL;DR

  • Choose Playroom if you’re shipping a casual web game this week, you don’t want to operate any backend, and you accept managed-only deployment.
  • Choose Pylon if you want self-hosting, full server authority, persistent domain data, or a dedicated server runtime.

​
Big picture

​
Architecture

Playroom uses a host-authoritative room-state model: when players join a room, one participant is elected host and is responsible for authoritative state changes. Other participants send changes through that model. For unreliable state updates, Playroom can use WebRTC; reliable updates go through its WebSocket server. This is brilliant for “trivia game with 4 friends” — no custom server code, simple integration. It struggles when:
  • The host has a slow phone and tanks the room
  • The host disconnects mid-game and state has to be re-synced from peers
  • You need server-side validation (anti-cheat, scoring authority)
  • Concurrent players exceed what the elected host and room model can comfortably simulate
Pylon (and Colyseus, and Nakama) use a server-authoritative model: the server runs the tick loop, all state lives on the server, clients send inputs and receive state. More expensive operationally; more robust. One thing to know up front, since Playroom’s audience is web/JS developers: Pylon’s authoritative tick loop is written in Rust (the Shard<S: SimState> crate), with a useShard React hook to connect from the client. There’s no TypeScript API for the server simulation today. Your app data, auth, and functions stay in TypeScript — but the shard authority itself means writing Rust.

​
Where Playroom is better

  • Time-to-first-multiplayer — minutes, not hours. The SDK includes a discovery UI, joins via room codes, and “just works” with a few lines of code.
  • Web/mobile cross-play — handles different platforms invisibly.
  • Fast prototypes — the hosted model is excellent for hobby projects and throwaway experiments.
  • No backend to deploy — at all. Add the SDK, ship.
  • Phone-as-controller — Playroom has a slick “stream from your laptop, control from your phone” pattern.

​
Where Pylon is better

  • You own your backend — no vendor outage takes down your game.
  • Server authority — players can’t hack the host. Critical for competitive games or anything with persistent rewards.
  • Persistent player data — every player has a real account with stable identity, not a per-room guest. Inventory, progress, friends, leaderboards, cosmetics — all first-class.
  • Higher authority ceiling — server tick loops scale beyond what one elected client can safely simulate.
  • Backend logic — server-side validation, anti-cheat, complex matchmaking, fraud detection.
  • Self-host — no per-player pricing as you grow.
  • Open source — fork it, ship it, never depend on a vendor.

​
Use case fit

​
Pricing

Check Playroom’s current pricing and limits before launch. It is designed to make prototypes and lightweight multiplayer cheap to start. Pylon self-hosting is just infrastructure cost. Pylon Cloud uses plan quotas plus machine compute. That is more operational responsibility than Playroom, but it gives you a dedicated server runtime, durable data, and a path to move off the hosted platform.

​
Migrating from Playroom

If you started with Playroom and outgrew it:
  1. Move authority to the server — port your “host” logic into a SimState::tick impl on the Pylon side (this is Rust — Pylon’s shard authority isn’t a TypeScript API today, so budget for that rewrite)
  2. Convert room state from key-value to entities — Playroom’s getState/setState pattern maps to Pylon’s entity CRUD
  3. Add real auth — replace guest sessions with magic-code sign-in (or keep guest sessions for “just play” via /api/auth/guest)
  4. Persist player data — move from Playroom’s volatile state to Pylon entities
The hardest part is the mental shift from peer-state to server-authoritative. The code itself is straightforward.

​
Honest weakness

Playroom’s developer experience for the “ship a party game this weekend” use case is genuinely better than any server-authoritative option, including Pylon. The SDK is more polished for web games specifically; the room-code join UX is excellent; the phone-as-controller story has no Pylon equivalent. If you’re building a hackathon project or an MVP to validate a multiplayer game idea, start with Playroom. Migrate to Pylon (or Colyseus, or Nakama) when you outgrow the host-authoritative client model.

​
Both / and

You can use Playroom for the lightweight lobby UX and Pylon for persistent player data + leaderboards + matchmaking, with the clients pulling from both. This is unusual but valid — Playroom’s strength is the realtime party-game shape; Pylon’s strength is everything else around it.