Skip to main content
Playroom Kit is a managed multiplayer SDK aimed at web games (HTML5, Unity WebGL, browser puzzles). It optimizes hard for “ship a working multiplayer game in an afternoon” — at the cost of being a managed-only black box.

​
TL;DR

  • Choose Playroom if you’re shipping a casual web game this week, you don’t want to operate any backend, and you accept managed-only deployment.
  • Choose Pylon if you want self-host, full server authority, persistent player data, or more than ~20 concurrent players per room.

​
Big picture

PylonPlayroom
LicenseMIT / Apache 2.0Proprietary
Self-host✅❌ managed only
Server authority✅ tick-based⚠️ host-relay model (one client is “host”)
Persistent player data✅ entities + auth⚠️ key-value only, in-memory by default
Built-in auth✅⚠️ guest-by-default
File storage✅❌
Search✅❌
Game shards / rooms✅✅
Setup complexityMediumVery low
Max concurrent players per roomHigh (server-bound)Modest (host-bound)

​
Architecture

Playroom uses a host-relay model: when players join a room, one client is elected “host” and runs the authoritative state. Other clients send inputs to the host; the host broadcasts state via Playroom’s relay servers. If the host disconnects, another client is promoted. This is brilliant for “trivia game with 4 friends” — zero server cost, near-zero latency, very simple integration. It struggles when:
  • The host has a slow phone and tanks the room
  • The host disconnects mid-game and state has to be re-synced from peers
  • You need server-side validation (anti-cheat, scoring authority)
  • Concurrent players exceed what one client can simulate (~20 in practice)
Pylon (and Colyseus, and Nakama) use a server-authoritative model: the server runs the tick loop, all state lives on the server, clients send inputs and receive state. More expensive operationally; more robust.

​
Where Playroom is better

  • Time-to-first-multiplayer — minutes, not hours. The SDK includes a discovery UI, joins via room codes, and “just works” with a few lines of code.
  • Web/mobile cross-play — handles different platforms invisibly.
  • Free tier — generous for hobbyists.
  • Voice chat integration — built in.
  • No backend to deploy — at all. Add the SDK, ship.
  • Phone-as-controller — Playroom has a slick “stream from your laptop, control from your phone” pattern.

​
Where Pylon is better

  • You own your backend — no vendor outage takes down your game.
  • Server authority — players can’t hack the host. Critical for competitive games or anything with persistent rewards.
  • Persistent player data — every player has a real account with stable identity, not a per-room guest. Inventory, progress, friends, leaderboards, cosmetics — all first-class.
  • Higher player count per room — server tick loop scales beyond what one phone can simulate.
  • Backend logic — server-side validation, anti-cheat, complex matchmaking, fraud detection.
  • Self-host — no per-player pricing as you grow.
  • Open source — fork it, ship it, never depend on a vendor.

​
Use case fit

Game typeRecommended
2–8 player party gamePlayroom
Trivia / quiz / drawingPlayroom
Phone-as-controller experiencePlayroom
Casual co-op web gameEither
Competitive multiplayer (rankings matter)Pylon (or Colyseus, Nakama)
Persistent-world gamePylon
50+ concurrent players per roomPylon
Game with progression, inventory, profilePylon
Internal corp game (no signup, just join)Playroom
Mobile game with cross-playPlayroom for prototyping; Pylon for production at scale

​
Pricing

Playroom’s pricing is per-CCU (concurrent users) on their managed cloud, with a generous free tier. At scale, costs grow linearly. Pylon Cloud bills per-request and per-WS-connection-minute, with a free tier. Self-hosted, you pay your VPS — fixed cost regardless of player count up to the box’s capacity. For ~10 concurrent players, Playroom is essentially free. For ~10,000 concurrent players, Pylon self-hosted on a single VPS is cheaper than Playroom’s managed offering.

​
Migrating from Playroom

If you started with Playroom and outgrew it:
  1. Move authority to the server — port your “host” logic into a SimState::tick impl on the Pylon side
  2. Convert room state from key-value to entities — Playroom’s getState/setState pattern maps to Pylon’s entity CRUD
  3. Add real auth — replace guest sessions with magic-code sign-in (or keep guest sessions for “just play” via /api/auth/guest)
  4. Persist player data — move from Playroom’s volatile state to Pylon entities
The hardest part is the mental shift from peer-state to server-authoritative. The code itself is straightforward.

​
Honest weakness

Playroom’s developer experience for the “ship a party game this weekend” use case is genuinely better than any server-authoritative option, including Pylon. The SDK is more polished for web games specifically; the room-code join UX is excellent; the phone-as-controller story has no Pylon equivalent. If you’re building a hackathon project or an MVP to validate a multiplayer game idea, start with Playroom. Migrate to Pylon (or Colyseus, or Nakama) when you outgrow the host-relay model.

​
Both / and

You can use Playroom for the lightweight “lobby + voice chat” UX and Pylon for persistent player data + leaderboards + matchmaking, with the clients pulling from both. This is unusual but valid — Playroom’s strength is the realtime party-game shape; Pylon’s strength is everything else around it.